Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000M +127%
0.638 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
7
-
Compute Units
-
112
Shading Units
336
56
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GF104
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

78W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy