Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +652%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1344
56
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

78W
TDP
108W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK104
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy