Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
14480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +43685%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
228
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
14592
56
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Board Design

78W
TDP
760W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
MI300
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
146 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy