Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700M +340%
0.352 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
128
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
35.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
G84
NB9E-GLM3
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy