Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1792GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition +1004%
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
8
16
Shading Units
256
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
142W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GF100
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
2.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy