Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100 +23400%
10.34 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1304 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
56
16
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
235W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GP100
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy