Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25 +27831%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Vega 10
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy