Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075 +2236%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
448
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GF110
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

28W
TDP
247W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
2.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy