NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+11311%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
34W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
