NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 62W)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
+1271%
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
4
16
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
62W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
