NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
8176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+42042%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
8192
8
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
UMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
8 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
