NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 34W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
+66%
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
1
16
Shading Units
8
8
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
34W
TDP
23W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
