NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1537MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 34W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Mobile
+17888%
6.296 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
832 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1537 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.18 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.296 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.296 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
98.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
