Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA A10M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA A10M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
A10M +4973%
23.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA102
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy