Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +286%
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM206
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy