Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Mobile +3722%
17.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
46
192
Shading Units
5888
64
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
276.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.66 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.66 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
276.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
140W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA104
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy