Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2070 Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Tesla M2070 Q +122%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GF100
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
GF100-876-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy