Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +3878%
16.79 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
43.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
DG2-512
N10E-GLM3-B2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy