Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +323%
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
43.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GM206
N10E-GLM3-B2
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy