Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA RTX A4000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA RTX A4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
RTX A4000 +4442%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
48
128
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
43.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
140W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA104
N10E-GLM3-B2
GPU Variant
GA104-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy