Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +1195%
5.468 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
128
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
43.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA107S
N10E-GLM3-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy