Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (154W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075 +346%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
14
96
Shading Units
448
24
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

154W
TDP
247W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy