Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
19360 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +70943%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
19456
24
TMUs
880
24
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

134W
TDP
750W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
MI300
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
146 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy