Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
7584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +5908%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
7680
24
TMUs
240
24
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

134W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
90 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
8 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy