NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1792GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
+111%
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
8
96
Shading Units
256
24
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
142W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GF100
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
