Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (28W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition +950%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
28W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy