Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1582MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000 Mobile +1302%
6.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1278 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1582 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.2 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
202.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
101.2 GFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.480 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
202.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
N17E-Q5-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy