Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro T1200 Mobile +531%
2.918 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.60 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
91.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.837 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.918 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
91.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
18W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy