NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+2802%
13.41 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1.02TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
60
24
SM Count
48
192
Shading Units
3840
64
TMUs
240
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
192 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Vega 20
-
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
