Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
19264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +35267%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
19456
64
TMUs
880
24
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
192 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
750W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
146 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy