Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +356%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1344
64
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
108W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy