Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 24 GB +1381%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
285.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM200
-
GPU Variant
GM200-880-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy