Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +4049%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
48
192
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy