Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1140MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (132.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB +1163%
5.837 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
652 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1140 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
132.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.48 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
91.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.837 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.837 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
91.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy