Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2004
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

NV43
GPU Name
TU106
NV43 GL
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Curie
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy