Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition +272%
0.369 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
368.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
90 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy