CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
+272%
0.369 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
VS
Quadro FX 1700M
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
368.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
90 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Board Design
171W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla K80
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla K40s
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy