Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 570M and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 570M
0.061 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +23473%
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
72
32
Shading Units
4608
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
7.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
60.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
TU102
NB8P-GL
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy