Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA GRID K200

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (40W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
GRID K200 +3079%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
GK104
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy