Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
40 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M +452%
0.116 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
1
48
Shading Units
8
16
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
G98
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy