Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
3792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000 +10787%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
30
48
Shading Units
3840
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GP102
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy