Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +6037%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
36
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
TU104
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
160W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy