Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 800W)
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075 +436%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GT200B
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy