Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
4432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800 +38503%
44.78 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2499 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
70
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
4480
16
TMUs
280
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
70
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
319.9 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
699.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.56 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.78 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1399 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Navi 31
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy