Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
7376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q +16029%
18.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
58
48
Shading Units
7424
16
TMUs
232
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GA103
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
22 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy