Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1442MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (235W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 732.2GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100
10.34 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +34%
13.89 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1304 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
715 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
108
3584
Shading Units
6912
224
TMUs
432
96
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
400W
550 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
7 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.0
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net