Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2050MHz vs 1442MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100
10.34 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +62%
16.79 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1304 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
715 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

235W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.0
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net