Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (868.4GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro GV100 +1150%
16.66 TFLOPS
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Volta
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1132 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
848 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
868.4GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
16
5120
Shading Units
512
320
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
48
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

208.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
520.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
33.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
8.330 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GF110
GV100-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
3 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy