Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K1100M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 44.80GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1100M
0.542 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090 +145%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
44.80GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.648 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
22.59 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
542.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
22.59 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy