Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1200MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +593%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
26
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
3328
32
TMUs
104
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA106
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
12 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy