Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA A10G

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
A10G +4200%
31.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
9216
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA102
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy